Mini-post: I think I know what Ron’s 10s signify on his FBI docs

The last time we talked, I posted (among other things) a bunch of FBI documents that have the number 10 written in the top righthand corner, just like Ron’s. There were potential assassination attempts against Vice President Spiro Agnew as well as Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeaubomb threats against Prince Charles and Princess Diana as well as a federal building in Madison, Wisconsin; the alleged use of brainwashing and kidnapping by religious cults; the unlawful flight of mass murderer Richard Speck; the latest intel on soldier-of-fortune Frank Sturgis and mobster Santo Trafficante, both of whom were involved in efforts to overthrow Fidel Castro; and the use of extortion against high-profile victims, including congressmen, senators, heads of federal agencies, and Frank Sinatra. Granted, it’s a hodge podge, but you have to admit that there’s an elevated level of danger associated with them. On a scale from one to ten, with ten being the most serious crimes you could ever be charged with, I’d say these were definitely up there. 

But then there was also Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. His Southern Christian Leadership Conference was granted its fair share of 10s too, even though their principal activities were hosting meetings and planning sit-ins and marches, which, the last time I checked, are one hundred percent legal.

You may recall from my last post that I’d also hypothesized that the numbers in the righthand corners referred to FBI agents whose job responsibilities involved communicating with certain federal agencies. These agents were called FBI liaisons, and they were housed in the Division of Domestic Intelligence during the 1950s to early 70s. I’m still holding onto that hypothesis.

This brings us to today’s announcement. Today, I’m going to reveal the federal agency whose FBI liaison, I believe, was alerted to Ron’s documents along with all of the other documents that were given 10s in their righthand corners. But before I do, I’m going to share several more 10s with you.

Assassination of Senator and Presidential Candidate Robert Kennedy

Click on image for a closer view.
Click on image for a closer view.

Bomb threat against the U.S. Supreme Court

Click on image for a closer view.
Click on image for a closer view.

Bomb threat against Frank Sinatra and the Fontainebleau Hotel

Click on image for a closer view.

Extortion/death threat against Secretary of State Dean Rusk

Click on image for a closer view.

Memo from Secret Service Director James Rowley to the FBI seeking info about Frank Sturgis

Click on image for a closer view.

That last one was a clue, because, you guys? I think the 10s signify the United States Secret Service, aka USSS. In other words, I think whoever put the 10s on Ron’s missing person docs felt it was necessary that the FBI’s liaison to the Secret Service have a look at them.

Why do I think this? I believe this based on the other documents we’ve found with 10s on them. Clearly, the Secret Service needs to be in the loop regarding potential threats to a U.S. President, Vice President, President-elect, Vice President-elect, and immediate family members. They also protect major presidential candidates, former Presidents and Vice Presidents, visiting foreign heads of state, and so on. According to Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 3056, protecting these people are the primary responsibility of the Secret Service.

But did you know that, over the years, the FBI has provided the Secret Service with additional information too? In the July 1973 Agreement Between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Secret Service Concerning Protective Responsibilities, which was updated at roughly the same time that FBI agents were passing around Ron’s missing person documentsthis information might have included:

  1. Information concerning attempts, threats, or conspiracies to injure, kill, or kidnap persons protected by the USSS or other U.S. or foreign officials in the U.S. or abroad.
  2. Information concerning attempts or threats to redress a grievance against any public official by other than legal means, or attempts personally to contact such officials for that purpose.
  3. Information concerning threatening, irrational, or abusive written or oral statements about U.S. Government or foreign officials.
  4. Information concerning civil disturbances, anti-U.S. demonstrations or incidents or demonstrations against foreign diplomatic establishments.
  5. Information concerning illegal bombings or bomb-making; concealment of caches of firearms, explosives, or other implements of war; or other terrorist activity.
  6. Information concerning persons who defect or indicate a desire to defect from the United States and who demonstrate one or more of the following characteristics:
    • Irrational or suicidal behavior or other emotional instability.
    • Strong or violent anti-U.S. sentiment.
    • A propensity toward violence.
  7. Information concerning individuals who may be considered potentially dangerous to individuals protected by the USSS because of their background or activities, including evidence of emotional instability or participation in groups engaging in activities inimical to the United States.

Obviously, they made some judgment calls. 

The one that convinced me that we were dealing with the Secret Service was #5, illegal bombings or bomb-making, since so many bomb-related FBI docs of this time period carry 10s on them.

So there you have it. In addition to the FBI, DOJ, and CIA, I think the Secret Service had an interest in Ron Tammen. If we’re right about this, what do you think it was about Ron that they could have found so interesting?

Thanks to the Mary Ferrell Foundation and The Black Vault for access to these records.

10 thoughts on “Mini-post: I think I know what Ron’s 10s signify on his FBI docs

  1. I still keep going back to the idea that maybe Ron wasn’t a criminal at all, but was doing something like undercover work for the CIA

    From the documents we’ve seen, it doesn’t seem like these agencies really tried to hide the identities of the criminals or suspected threats they were interested in. But if he were tasked with infiltrating a group of suspects, it might make sense that they would give him a new identity for his protection.

    Would that still warrant a 10 on his FBI documents though? And again, that doesn’t explain why none of them seem to contain any reference to an alternate name.

    I’m certainly not set on this theory, but it keeps coming to mind for some reason.

    1. I hope you’re right! Also, it might explain why he was ostensibly allowed to do whatever he was doing without being arrested. In any case, it’s good to have you along so our imaginations don’t immediately go to the dark side.

    1. I know…it makes so much sense. I can’t believe it took me this long to figure it out! I’ve started submitting FOIAs to the Secret Service now. So far, they’ve been quick with their acknowledgements. Hopefully, that’s a good sign that I’ll be getting records soon.

  2. This makes all the sense in the world. My HS government teacher had a friend who was in the SS come speak to us: he said that they ALWAYS provide protection to visiting dignitaries, even if they bring their own security, so they’d definitely be interested in threats against Trudeau. They also always accompany the president and other US officials when thdy go abroad, even if the country they’re visiting is providing security.

    Because this was early 2002, he also mentioned that they were doing a lot of investigating into “potential terrorists,” and though most of the tips they received were pretty worthless (like a call about a Sikh family down the street, because turban apparently = terrorist), they still had to follow up on EVERYTHING. That was something I found interesting, largely because I figured that sort of thing would be under the purview of the FBI, not Secret Service.

    1. Interesting. And it does make total sense, doesn’t it?

      A couple additional thoughts are that the recent release of RFK docs yielded only a few 10s. However, there weren’t very many other numbers either, and the area where you’d usually find the numbers was either blackened or taped over with white tape. It could be that they decided to hide them. (I’d love to know when those redactions were made.) This tells me that the numbers and other scribbles in the location that we’re currently focused on are indeed significant.

      The fun part of this is now I have a new agency to FOIA. Yesterday, I submitted one about Spiro Agnew’s golf course incident. There will be many more, I’m sure. As usual, the hardest one to submit will be about Ron since a) I don’t know what his name was after he disappeared, and b) I don’t have proof of his death. But I’ll see what I can do.

      1. “The fun part of this is now I have a new agency to FOIA.”

        Congratulations, now your own FBI file has a 10 on it! 😉😁😘

      2. Oh, and here’s another reason why the SS would be interested in mass murderers and cults, although it’s a bit later than when we’re talking about, and thus otherwise irrelevant: Roselyn Carter, in her duties as First Lady, met both Jim Jones and John Wayne Gacy.

      3. Wha?? I had no idea! Thanks for passing this along.

        Also, not sure if you follow my FB page, but I’ve posted a link from Jefferson Morley’s JFK Facts Substack. (jfkfacts.substack.com) Abraham Bolden, a former Secret Service agent under JFK, will be testifying tomorrow to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. He was fired for not going along with the government’s narrative. People associated with the HSCA and ARRB will be testifying as well. Should be good.

Leave a Reply to jwengerCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.